Introduction
to Volume 1
- Michael J. Cripps & Cynthia Haller
What Role Does
the "Glass Ceiling" Play for Women in Accounting?
- Lydia L. Bryant
Nanotechnology:
A Science Fiction or Technology of the Future?
- Tomas Cyparski
Lupus and Compliance:
The Problem of Compliance in Lupus Patients
- Amara Diggs
Playing With
Children's Minds: The Psychological Effects of Tobacco Advertising
on Children
- Joanna Hull
Sanctions
Against South Africa
- Charles S. Miller
Ebonics and
the African-American Student: Why Ebonics has a Place in the Classroom
- Stacey Thomas |

Problems and Dangers Associated with Nanotechnology
To become feasible, nanotechnology must overcome many technical
problems. These problems concern interacting nanoscale objects with
complex chemical bonding forces and quantum mechanics in a nanoscale
environment (Ashley, 2001). The major problem is associated with
the construction of the assembler. As mentioned earlier, the assembler
would have a moving arm which would pick up an atom and insert it
in the desired place. To be able to do that, this moving arm should
be smaller than the atom. But atoms are already the smallest building
blocks from which the arm’s jaws can be built (Whitesides,
2001). Another obstacle lies in the nature of atoms, their tendency
to bond strongly to their neighbors. The atom which is to be moved
will adhere to the assembler’s arm. So it will be very difficult
to release this atom in precisely the right spot (Smalley, 2001).
The effectiveness of the assembler in placing atoms in the desired
place would be perhaps up to a billion new atoms per second. Although
this rate seems very fast, in the macroscopic world it would be
virtually useless. To produce 30 grams or about one ounce would
require at least 6 x 1023 bonds, one for each atom. At the rate
of 109 per second it would take this assembler 19 million years
(Smalley, 2001). To be of any practical use, this molecular machine
must be able to make another copy of itself, i.e. to self-replicate,
much as biological cells do (Drexler, 1986; Ashley, 2001; Smalley,
2001; Whitesides, 2001). The process of self-replication of one
assembler would take approximately one thousand seconds. So, at
the end of ten hours there would be over 68 billion copies of new
replicators. In less than a day they would weigh a ton; in less
than two days, they would outweigh the Earth; in another four hours,
they would exceed the mass of the Sun and all the planets combined,
if the materials needed to make new copies have not been depleted
before (Drexler, 1986). This scenario has raised the prospect of
what has come to be called grey goo: billions of tiny nanorobots
replicating uncontrollably, consuming everything in their path (Stix,
2001; Whitesides, 2001). So far, we do not even know how to build
a self-replicating machine of any size or type (Whitesides, 2001).
Environmentalists fear that nanotechnology may create contaminants
whose tiny size makes them very hazardous. For example, nanoparticles
are not dangerous themselves but with contact with other particles
which are hazardous they also may become harmful. Many nanoparticles
serve as bloodstream carriers that attack many dangerous diseases,
e.g. cancer. They also could carry hazardous toxins (Krane, 2002).
Some researchers speculate that carbon nanotube molecules which
are used in production of electronic parts may cause cancer the
way asbestos fibers do (Krane, 2002).
Huge nanotechnological potential can also be used to extend today’s
weapon capabilities by miniaturizing guns, explosives and electronics
components of missiles. Disassemblers could attack physical structures
or even biological organisms at the molecular level. Moreover, this
technology would find many applications in electronic surveillance,
where molecular size microphones, cameras and homing beacons could
monitor and track other people (Chen, 2003).
|